Is Vaping Health Risky?
The writer examines the possible social and health benefits of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She identifies e-cigarettes as electronic cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the various options available for teens in light of the fact that smoking has become a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that we should consider the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also considering the dangers of nicotine addiction. The author also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I agree with her that e-cigarette vaporizers certainly are a harmless option to smoking, if used correctly.
A lot of the data on smoking and its risks comes from adults, which makes it hard to assess how the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It’s estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths every year are due to smoking. This figure is probable an underestimation, because so many deaths may be the result of second hand smoke. In addition, it assumes that people who smoke don’t intend to achieve this.
The writer suggests that we should consider the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the effect of tobacco products, while providing a far less harmful experience. The problem with this particular approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, though it isn’t. Many people don’t understand how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking is to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that people who utilize the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that comes from this is that because e smokers don’t feel the physical effects of smoking, they can’t be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it is critical to remember that smoking and using vaporizers are both very similar behaviors. Why is vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to achieve the same effect as smoking, minus the associated risks. Vaporizing offers podsmall.com a highly similar experience as smoking. This means that vapers may be increasing their likelihood of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they are taking steps in direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a healthier lifestyle.
The author makes some valid points about the dangers of smoking. He also makes some valid criticisms of having less nicotine, and of the dangers of carbon monoxide smoke. However, his real issue is one of regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies shouldn’t be permitted to advertise their products as safe when all they have done is increase the quantity of chemicals and additives which are present in traditional cigarettes. The problem with this argument is that we have already seen the negative effects of increased degrees of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We already have countless reports concerning the negative unwanted effects of nicotine, especially in smokers attempting to quit. We already have a lot of stories about the rise of cancers and respiratory problems caused by long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been an important factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths over the past couple of years.
The author does not appear to recognize the irony of arguing against smoking by way of a healthier alternative, but doesn’t seem to think about the potential negative health effects of his product either. He also discounts the idea that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually turn back to cigarette smoking. He seems to think that all we have to do to beat cigarettes would be to reduce the amount of nicotine we take in. The fact is that smokers who try to quit often do so due to other medical issues, and aren’t just embracing the cigarettes to get away from their bad habits. There are numerous reasons why people smoke. The writer has basically ignored all of them in his arguments against vaping.
Although it is true that the cigarettes do not contain any real tobacco, a few of the chemicals found in using tobacco are found in the smokes. The writer seems to be of the fact that all we need to do to solve the issue of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we ingest through our lungs. The argument he presents is merely not based in sound scientific fact. There is no real proof that reducing the quantity of chemicals we take in improves anything other than our health. The author also discounts the theory that the cigarettes are less hazardous than regular cigarettes since they don’t contain the harmful chemicals within regular cigarettes.